But, he insists, we must bring in new people and integrate young researchers into the field. This involves helping current researchers keep their momentum, through funding and moral support. But, crucially, it also involves getting younger people involved. "It's time to pass the torch," he said. There’s an opportunity to recruit new faces, he explains, because there was a point where it skipped a generation because of all the original backlash. He says we may now have new open minds who want to take a look and join LENR's collective research project.
For Tanzella, this is vital for ensuring the field’s continued progress and realizing its potential to address global energy challenges. Indeed, he explained that the key to advancing LENR lies in human ingenuity rather than solely in technological innovation. This people-focused approach is central to his vision, emphasizing the role of committed individuals over time in overcoming current challenges and advancing the field. His comments reflect a belief in the transformative power of collective effort and the importance of nurturing a new generation of researchers to carry forward the promise of LENR and carry out the crucial “fundamental work” needed to build stronger foundations for the field.
In essence, Tanzella's perspective is a blend of optimism, recognition of the challenges ahead, and a call to action for the scientific community to embrace and explore the potential of LENR. “I think there will be reproducible and transportable experiments, and I hope those experiments will be scalable to something significant,” he said. He acknowledged the field’s stumbling blocks, namely reproducibility, theorization, and scalability. These challenges, for Tanzella, should not cause despair. Instead, he thinks it presents opportunities for current and future researchers to contribute to a field that stands on the cusp of contributing to the global quest for cleaner and more sustainable energy solutions.
Clean Energy Toolbox
He says, “It has the potential to make society a better place to live and work.” But he’s also a pragmatist and doesn’t think LENR will be the only solution. As he explained:
“It’s a tool in the toolbox. I don't view it as overwhelmingly disruptive because I think there will be many answers to providing energy and hopefully clean energy soon. And this is just going to be one of them. I view it as being only positive. I don't see any negative disruptions. But then, I'm an optimist that people can be retrained. And you often hear people complaining, ‘No, I've been doing this for 20 years. You can't teach me anything new. I can't learn to do what all this new stuff is about.’ But I honestly don't believe that. With enough impetus and motivation, the different jobs in energy and the different energy sources right now can be replaced with cleaner energies, whether they come from LENR or something else—or maybe not all of them will be clean. Maybe, in general, there will still be many fossil fuels, but hopefully, they'll be carbon-neutral. I see [LENR] as part of the solution, but I don't see it as having negative disruptions."